<?xml version="1.0"?>
<!-- name="generator" content="blosxom/2.0" -->
<!DOCTYPE rss PUBLIC "-//Netscape Communications//DTD RSS 0.91//EN" "http://my.netscape.com/publish/formats/rss-0.91.dtd">

<rss version="0.91">
  <channel>
    <title>floppaganda   </title>
    <link>http://www.floppymoose.com/weblog</link>
    <description>all the moose that's fit to print</description>
    <language>en</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 19 Oct 2004 12:18:00 GMT</lastBuildDate>

  <item>
    <title>Ad Blocking Improvements + Flash blocking</title>
    <link>http://www.floppymoose.com/weblog/2004/10/19#20041019a</link>
    <description>Grab my latest &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.floppymoose.com/userContent.css&quot;&gt;userContent.css&lt;/a&gt;
to pick up the current state of the art in ad blocking.  Installation directions 
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.floppymoose.com&quot;&gt;here&lt;/a&gt;.  Also with the directions is some new
information on how to block Flash advertisements.  Clean up your web surfing the easy way!</description>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Ad Blocking CSS instructions updated to include Thunderbird</title>
    <link>http://www.floppymoose.com/weblog/2004/10/14#20041014a</link>
    <description>Now you can block ads in your email as well.  If you are using the Thunderbird email
client, simply follow my instructions &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.floppymoose.com&quot;&gt;here&lt;/a&gt; 
to get rid of pesky ads in your email.</description>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Capital Radio: Best Oldies Music on the Net</title>
    <link>http://www.floppymoose.com/weblog/2004/10/09#20041009a</link>
    <description>Looking for a good Oldies internet music station?  
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.capitalradio.us&quot;&gt;Capital Radio&lt;/a&gt; is way out in front of the rest.
You can find them in the 70's/80's section of your iTunes Radio listings,
or you can go to their website and click on the 
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.capitalradio.us/listen.html&quot;&gt;listen&lt;/a&gt; link. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt; 
The station plays 50's
through 80's.  The best aspect (aside from being commercial free) is that the playlist stresses
the songs that aren't played by those other oldies stations.  You are much more likely to 
hear Elvis's &lt;b&gt;&lt;i&gt;Guitar Man&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/b&gt; than &lt;b&gt;&lt;i&gt;Heartbreak Hotel&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/b&gt;.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I have no financial interest in Capital Radio, 
just sharing the love for my favorite station.</description>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Safari css improvements</title>
    <link>http://www.floppymoose.com/weblog/2004/07/04#20040703a</link>
    <description>Safari now correctly runs my 
&lt;a href= &quot;http://www.floppymoose.com/projects/jssilly.html&quot;&gt;
goofy dynamic html retro screensaver demo&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;Safari version: 1.2.2 (v125.8)</description>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Cutting taxes, non-Republican style</title>
    <link>http://www.floppymoose.com/weblog/2004/04/13#20040413a</link>
    <description>Tax season is here, and I just did mine.  Along the way I came across a table
of the tax rates for 2002 and 2003, illustrating the Bush tax cut in action:
&lt;div style=&quot;font-family: monospace; margin: 1em; white-space: pre;&quot;&gt;
&lt;b&gt;Single  2002&lt;/b&gt;   	 
$0 to $6,000         10%
$6,001 to $27,950    15%
$27,951 to $67,700   27% 	
$67,701 to $141,250  30%
$141,251 to $307,050 35%
$307,051 and up      38.6%

&lt;b&gt;Single  2003&lt;/b&gt;   	 
$0 to $7,000         10% 	
$7,001 to $28,400    15% 	
$28,401 to $68,800   25% 	
$68,801 to $143,500  28% 	
$143,501 to $311,950 33% 	
$311,951 and up      35%

&lt;/div&gt;
Not only does the cut benefit the wealthy on an absolute dollar amount, but
even on a percentage basis!  The wealthy get 3.6% off, the middle
class 2%, and the poor zippo.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
Many pundits have commented that tax cuts must benefit the wealthy 
disproportionately no matter how you engineer it, but it's easy to put 
the lie to that.  Just raise
the standard deduction.  The wealthy do not use the standard deduction, 
because they itemize mortgage interest, investment losses, yada yada yada.
Only those at the bottom of the tax food chain are using the standard 
deduction.  Want to cut taxes for them?  Raise the standard 
deduction $10000.  As 
an added benefit, you will reduce tax fraud.  The higher the standard deduction,
the fewer folks will itemize.  Less itemization = less fraud.</description>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Never Metadata He Didn't Like</title>
    <link>http://www.floppymoose.com/weblog/2004/03/15#20040315a</link>
    <description>California Attorney General Bill Lockyer has 
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.wired.com/news/digiwood/0,1412,62665,00.html?tw=wn_culthead_5&quot;&gt;written a letter&lt;/a&gt; meant to
put the heat on the P2P providers.  Or has he?  In the metadata of the email a 
&quot;&lt;font style=&quot;font-variant: small-caps;&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;&lt;i&gt;stevensonv&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/font&gt;&quot; 
is present as an author.  
&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
Vans Stevenson is the Senior VP for state legislative affairs for the
Motion Picture Association of America (MPAA). The MPAA denies writing the letter.

</description>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Rock the Vote</title>
    <link>http://www.floppymoose.com/weblog/2004/03/02#20040302a</link>
    <description>Like many Californians, I voted today.&amp;nbsp; I knew something was up
when instead of handing me a ballot, I found a smart card in my hand.&amp;nbsp; Turning around, there they were:&amp;nbsp; the new voting
machines,&amp;nbsp; little touchscreen terminals with small privacy flaps on
the sides.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Going through the touchscreens was clearer than finding the tiny
numbered punch holes on the old style ballots.&amp;nbsp; At the end there
was a summary screen showing how I had voted.&amp;nbsp; I had left some
votes blank and it told me, giving me an opportunity to go back.&amp;nbsp;
I was much more certain that I had expressed my intentions
correctly then I ever had been with the punch ballot.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
But I am far less certain that my vote is being recorded
correctly.&amp;nbsp; In the end all I have is glowing screen.&amp;nbsp; Before
I had a physical token, the punch ballot, that could be reviewed by me
before submission, counted and recounted by machine &lt;span
style=&quot;font-weight: bold;&quot;&gt;and&lt;/span&gt; by hand.&amp;nbsp; Now I have
nothing.&amp;nbsp; We will never know if my vote was recorded properly.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Let's get the voting process back to the stone age, where it
belongs.&amp;nbsp; We'll put the votes on stone tablets.&amp;nbsp; Rock the
vote.
</description>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Amazon Outs Reviewers</title>
    <link>http://www.floppymoose.com/weblog/2004/02/16#20040216a</link>
    <description>Check out these stories (&lt;ahref=&quot;http://www.nytimes.com/2004/02/14/technology/14AMAZ.html?ex=1077339600&amp;amp;en=c9e13db55f83c40a&amp;amp;ei=5062&quot;&gt;NewYork Times&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;ahref=&quot;http://observer.guardian.co.uk/international/story/0,6903,1148577,00.html&quot;&gt;GuardianUnlimited&lt;/a&gt;) on how Amazon accidentally revealed the real identitiesof book review authors in the Amazon store.&amp;nbsp; It's an amusingexample of the privacy risks and the spoofing risks of anonymouscommentary on the net.&lt;br&gt;</description>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Voting Machines, Technology, and Confidence</title>
    <link>http://www.floppymoose.com/weblog/2003/11/21#20031121a</link>
    <description>Dan Gilmore has &lt;a href=&quot;http://weblog.siliconvalley.com/column/dangillmor/archives/001525.shtml#001525&quot;&gt;
commented on&lt;/a&gt; Dennis Kucinich's &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.house.gov/kucinich/issues/voting.htm&quot;&gt;criticisms&lt;/a&gt; of voting
machine manufacturer &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.diebold.com&quot;&gt;Diebold&lt;/a&gt;.
&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
Voting transparancy seems to be a big issue with Kucinich. It's great that someone is talking about this.
&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
People look at the Florida 2000 situation and think technology is the answer. And certainly technology can help. A touch screen can be a more accessible mechanism for chosing from a menu of choices than a punch ballot in small print.
&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
But there is a big difference between &lt;b&gt;clarity&lt;/b&gt; in voting, and &lt;b&gt;confidence&lt;/b&gt; in voting. You may be more sure you chose who you meant to choose, but how certain are you that your choice was properly counted?
&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
I think our first steps towards introducing more technology into voting should be to address clarity for the user.
&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
But for voter confidence we should still have physical tokens generated by the voting process. These tokens should be able to be examined by the voter at the poll. And of course they should be countable and recountable by hand &lt;b&gt;and&lt;/b&gt; by machine.</description>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Fake Blogs</title>
    <link>http://www.floppymoose.com/weblog/2003/11/19#20031119a</link>
    <description>Check out these recent entries in my Apache log files:&lt;br&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&lt;code&gt;&lt;small&gt;
217.73.164.106 - - [18/Nov/2003:00:30:21 -0800] &quot;GET / HTTP/1.0&quot; 200 7555 &quot;http://www.kwlablog.com/&quot; &quot;MSIE 6.0&quot;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
217.73.164.106 - - [18/Nov/2003:18:50:45 -0800] &quot;GET / HTTP/1.0&quot; 200 7555 &quot;http://www.jennifersblog.com/&quot; &quot;MSIE 6.0&quot;
&lt;/small&gt;&lt;/code&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;br&gt;
Both of these entries have a few interesting points.  They are from the same ip address,
which does not resolve to anything.  They both report a user agent of &quot;MSIE 6.0&quot;, which is not the actual user agent string of any version of IE.  And they both point to fake blogs.  
&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
Neither of these sites has an actual link to my site.  So the referrer strings are fake.  
&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
Looking up the domains reveals that both sites have a lot in common:&lt;br&gt;
&lt;table cellspacing=15&gt;&lt;tr&gt;
&lt;td style=&quot;padding-right: 15px; border-right: 2px solid #aad;&quot;&gt;&lt;code&gt;&lt;small&gt;
Domain Name: kwlablog.com&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Name Servers&lt;br&gt;
	ns1.kwlablog.com&lt;br&gt;
	141.85.3.109&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
	ns2.kwlablog.com&lt;br&gt;
	141.85.3.109&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Domain Created: 11/8/2003&lt;br&gt;
Domain Expires: 11/8/2004&lt;br&gt;
&lt;/small&gt;&lt;/code&gt;&lt;/td&gt;

&lt;td&gt;&lt;code&gt;&lt;small&gt;
Domain Name: jennifersblog.com&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Name Servers&lt;br&gt;
	ns1.jennifersblog.com&lt;br&gt;
	141.85.3.106&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
	ns2.jennifersblog.com&lt;br&gt;
	141.85.3.106&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Domain Created: 11/8/2003&lt;br&gt;
Domain Expires: 11/8/2004&lt;br&gt;
&lt;/small&gt;&lt;/code&gt;&lt;/td&gt;
&lt;/tr&gt;&lt;/table&gt;
But the sites have different names/addresses for Administrative, Billing, &amp; Technical contacts.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
Visiting the sites reveals that they have blog entries that are just links to news stories.  And most of the other links on the sites (like the archives links) don't actually do anything.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
What is the purpose of these fake blogs?  And what is the purpose of scattering them around webserver logfiles in the form of referrer strings?  Are these sites trying to take advantage of the recent trend to post referrer links within page content?  Are they using this fact to try to boost their search engine pagerank by appearing in this generated page content?</description>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Referrer Spamming</title>
    <link>http://www.floppymoose.com/weblog/2003/11/19#20031119b</link>
    <description>I've found some blog entries on the referrer spamming I mention in the previous 
&lt;span style=&quot;font-family: Marker Felt,Comic Sans MS,Arial,Sans-serif;&quot;&gt;floppaganda&lt;/span&gt;
 post.  You can find some good discussion at 
&lt;a href=&quot;http://fsck.clusterfsck.net/&quot;&gt;net warriors.org blog&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
Check out these blog entries in particular: 
&lt;a href=&quot;http://blog.netwarriors.org/d/site/related/2003/11/17/more_referrer_spamming&quot;&gt;More Referrer Spamming&lt;/a&gt;,
&lt;a href=&quot;http://blog.netwarriors.org/d/site/related/2003/11/18/referrer_spam_updates&quot;&gt;Referrer SPAM updates&lt;/a&gt;,
&lt;a href=&quot;http://blog.netwarriors.org/d/musings/misc/2003/11/19/referrer_spamming_wrap_up&quot;&gt;Referrer Spamming, wrap up&lt;/a&gt;.

</description>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>More Site Tinkering</title>
    <link>http://www.floppymoose.com/weblog/2003/11/16#20031116a</link>
    <description>I've expanded the discussion of ad blocking css on the 
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.floppymoose.com&quot;&gt;home page&lt;/a&gt;,
and tweaked the look of the entire site slightly.  
Next up is a Python starter project to do some simple 
Apache log file analysis.</description>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Ad Blocking Page Updated to include Safari</title>
    <link>http://www.floppymoose.com/weblog/2003/11/09#20031109a</link>
    <description>I now have instructions for using my ad blocking userContents.css with
the Safari web browser from Apple.  Find the updated instructions 
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.floppymoose.com/index.html&quot;&gt;here&lt;/a&gt;.</description>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Floppymoose to join A9</title>
    <link>http://www.floppymoose.com/weblog/2003/11/07#20031107a</link>
    <description>So much for lying in a beanbag wearing tighty whities and weilding a remote.  
I've decided to join the world of the employed once more.  A9 looks like
a great opportunity to learn a whole pile of new things and try to
solve some fun problems.  A9 is Amazon's search technology arm, spun off
into a subsidiary down here in Palo Alto.  There have been a 
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/news/archive/2003/09/25/financial2013EDT0223.DTL&quot;&gt;
few articles&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;a href=&quot;http://216.239.53.104/search?q=cache:tlqgzDUUFsMJ:www.theproduct.com/6m105/readings/fall03/amazon_search.pdf&amp;hl=en&amp;ie=UTF-8&quot;&gt; 
in the press&lt;/a&gt;
already, even though A9 isn't really started yet.</description>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>&amp;lt;lastbuilddate&amp;gt; goes 1.0</title>
    <link>http://www.floppymoose.com/weblog/2003/10/05#20031005a</link>
    <description>&lt;u&gt;What's new:&lt;/u&gt; Now RFC 822 compliant date formatting is the default.  You can 
go back to the old MoveableType style dating by setting: &lt;br&gt;
&lt;code&gt;my  = 0;&lt;/code&gt;&lt;br&gt;
Also perldoc style documentation has been added.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
&lt;u&gt;Known Issues:&lt;/u&gt; Plugins that provide their own &lt;code&gt;entries&lt;/code&gt; 
routine and do not return the 
story files in the &lt;code&gt;%files&lt;/code&gt; hash will cause lastbuilddate to find 
no date.  In this circumstance lastbuilddate will not emit a 
&lt;lastbuilddate&gt; field.  To work around this, rename lastbuilddate 
so that it executes ahead of these plugins.  For example, rename 
to 00lastbuilddate.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
Download &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.floppymoose.com/projects/blosxom/lastbuilddate&quot;&gt;
lastbuilddate here&lt;/a&gt;.</description>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>San Jose Judge Rejects Blight Suit&lt;br&gt;</title>
    <link>http://www.floppymoose.com/weblog/2003/09/25#20030925a</link>
    <description>One Monday, San Jose Judge Leslie Nichols 
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.bayarea.com/mld/mercurynews/news/local/6838893.htm&quot;&gt;
rejected the suit&lt;/a&gt; brought by Elaine Evans against the 
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.sjredevelopment.org/&quot;&gt;San Jose Redevelopment
Agency&lt;/a&gt; (SJRA) in an attempt to stop it's 
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.strongneighborhoods.org/&quot;&gt;Strong Neighborhoods 
Initiative&lt;/a&gt; (SNI) activities. I
attended the first half of the arguments in Superior Court on Monday
morning.&amp;nbsp; The heart of the case was whether Evans had properly
sought to bring her concerns to the redevelopment board.&amp;nbsp; In the
end the city prevailed on that point, but not before I heard a few
interesting bits along the way, including:&lt;br&gt;
&lt;ul&gt;
  &lt;li&gt;5 members of the council wrote the other 5 members, &lt;span
 style=&quot;font-style: italic;&quot;&gt;before the public hearing&lt;/span&gt;,
indicating that they were going to support the SNI plan.&lt;/li&gt;
  &lt;li&gt;Evans was at the public hearing and heard her concerns being
addressed to the council by others.&lt;/li&gt;
  &lt;li&gt;The city's own report on the concerns raised by the public
included the very issues Evans wanted addressed, namely that the blight
designation process was being abused.&lt;/li&gt;
  &lt;li&gt;The city paid an outside agency over $300,000 to &quot;justify&quot;
designating the area blighted.&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ul&gt;
The real problem seems to be a requirement that &quot;blight&quot; be found
before redevelopment dollars can arrive.&amp;nbsp; These dollars come with
a terrible string attached: eminent domain.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; Once an area
has been designated blighted the city has the power to take the land.</description>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>floppaganda look updated</title>
    <link>http://www.floppymoose.com/weblog/2003/09/17#200309171b</link>
    <description>I continue to twiddle the look of floppaganda.  It looks best on mozilla due to the 
use of rounded borders (which is a mozilla-only css feature), and it looks best on mac 
due to use of &lt;code&gt;&amp;nbsp;Marker Felt &lt;/code&gt; and &lt;code&gt; American Typewriter &lt;/code&gt; fonts.  
I'm investigating adding writeback and trackback features... stay tuned.</description>
  </item>
  </channel>
</rss>